“Crisis
in the economy, polity and society formed the background of his rise to power. Born
in a small town with a humble background, he spent his youth in poverty. Early
in his career, he joined a right-wing organization which would shape him. Looking
back, he will be the one who ends up shaping the organization. He grows through
the ranks of this organization with his oratory skills.
Becoming
restless with the party at the centre, he at first tries to mobilise popular
support, but fails. But the decline in the economy of the country continues,
the economic environment falters, food prices soar, businesses shut down, currency depreciates,
jobs are under pressure and middle classes are threatened. In such a situation,
the propaganda of his party stirs hopes for a better future. 4 years ago, his
party could nowhere be seen as a winner, but in just these few years, the situation
entirely reverses. Public discontent, utterly horrid economic situation and
lack of strong and effective governance helps win support for him and his
party. Now his party is on the verge of majority in the parliament, and he is
certain to become the next leader of the nation – the last hope of a drowning
economy, the only ray of light for the distressed people.
Dwelling
on his nature, he always was a powerful speaker. His passion and his words
moved people. He promised to build a strong nation, undo the injustices imposed
on the people by the current government at the centre and restore the dignity
of the people of the proud nation. He promised employment for those looking for
work, and a secure future for the youth. He promised to weed out all foreign
powers working from inside of the nation against it, especially those sponsored
by the neighbouring countries. He excelled in whipping up a communal frenzy. He told the people that the people of the "other" religion living among them cannot take away their rights. He played to the popular sentiment and believed that the people of his religion cannot be taken for a ride by the "decadent elements" in the society.
He
devised a new style of politics. He understood the significance of symbolism
and spectacle in mass mobilisation. His party held massive rallies and public
meetings to demonstrate the support for him and instill a sense of unity among
the people. His party’s propaganda skilfully projected him as a messiah, a
saviour, a ‘knight in shining armour’ who had arrived to deliver people from
their distress. It is an image that captured the imagination of a people whose
sense of dignity and pride had been shattered, who were living in a time of
acute economic and political crisis.”
This is how history describes Adolf
Hitler and Nazi Germany during the years 1928-1932.
I see what you did there :P
ReplyDeleteIn 1932, the Germans thought that Hitler was the best thing to happen to their nation. But today most of the Germans do not want to discuss him, as he brought to their nation utter humiliation and decades of East-West Division.
ReplyDeleteExtremism in any form is bad and this is one of the best such examples.
The problem is that at a micro level, it's very difficult for someone to see the bigger picture. We'll never know until we try our tryst with authoritarianism. I just hope we step back in time.
DeleteOf course the best was saved for the last line. :)
ReplyDeleteBut the comparison was too much far fetched. A person is innocent unless proven guilty by the law. Time and again Indian court has given relief to NM. Anyway what material did you refer for the content of this blog?
It came out of the NCERT textbook of 7th standard. I changed the phrasing to hide any direct references.
DeleteThe problem is you cannot pin them down until they make a mistake. Until then, one cannot do much but sit back and watch them ride upon the buoyant wave of anti-incumbency.
ReplyDeleteBasic traits determine the behavior of a man as a leader. No direct references but, yes, there are striking similarities with someone we know.
ReplyDeleteIt's scary how reading about one makes one think about the other!
Delete